Case study
If all the thoughtful, ethical, critical people opt out, governance gets made by people who don't see the problems. Kara stayed in the room. Her generation will write the rules — let them be the ones who saw the harms and engaged anyway.
Kara is the closing argument in human form. A ban may feel clean, but it can also train the most thoughtful people to leave the room where the rules are being written.
Her choice is not naive adoption. It is responsible proximity: learning enough to see the harms clearly, speak precisely, and participate in governance from lived experience.
Practice the move
Try Vibe Coding
Learn by building a tiny thing, then inspect where your judgment still matters.
Open exercise →